<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>REQID &#187; Systems Engineering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reqid.com/category/systems-engineering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reqid.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:40:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Systems Engineering is Catching On</title>
		<link>http://www.reqid.com/systems-engineering/systems-engineering-is-catching-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.reqid.com/systems-engineering/systems-engineering-is-catching-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. REQID</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Systems Engineering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reqid.com/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems to be a trend that customers are now asking for Systems Engineering Processes to be put in place on all types of contracts. It use to be just build type of contracts but now its showing up in other types of contracts for things like support programs. Systems Engineering process are a natural [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be a trend that customers are now asking for Systems Engineering Processes to be put in place on all types of contracts. It use to be just build type of contracts but now its showing up in other types of contracts for things like support programs. Systems Engineering process are a natural fit into these areas if you are flexable and can step outside of Mil-Std-1521. Those old processes are still a good standard for what they were writen for but they need some tayloring when it comes to commercial practices and support programs. With build programs you have a Physical product at the end of the process and with support programs there may be some physical elements the end product is a support process. So be creative in your design reviews and look for what is important for entry and exit criteria. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reqid.com/systems-engineering/systems-engineering-is-catching-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verification Methods</title>
		<link>http://www.reqid.com/systems-engineering/verification-methods/</link>
		<comments>http://www.reqid.com/systems-engineering/verification-methods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. REQID</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Systems Engineering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reqid.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to bring up a verification method that i am trying to revive. Its called &#8220;Process Control&#8221; and is a great way to validate requirements that have to do with Production Lines or Support Systems. Process control consist of validating requirements based on process in place to insure that things are being done the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to bring up a verification method that i am trying to revive. Its called &#8220;Process Control&#8221; and is a great way to validate requirements that have to do with Production Lines or Support Systems. Process control consist of validating requirements based on process in place to insure that things are being done the way they are suppose to be done. This could consist of audits, check lists, inspections, and Plans. The combination of these things ensure that there is a controlled process that is followed to ensure that the end product meets the requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reqid.com/systems-engineering/verification-methods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Systems Engineering</title>
		<link>http://www.reqid.com/systems-engineering/systems-engineering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.reqid.com/systems-engineering/systems-engineering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. REQID</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Systems Engineering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reqid.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Resent and not so resent reports out of the Defense Department have blamed a &#8220;lack of systems engineering&#8221; as a major cause of program failures. These failures range the field of program cancellation to large cost and schedule overruns. The question is whose fault is it that there is a lack of  systems engineering on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resent and not so resent reports out of the Defense Department have blamed a &#8220;lack of systems engineering&#8221; as a major cause of program failures. These failures range the field of program cancellation to large cost and schedule overruns. The question is whose fault is it that there is a lack of  systems engineering on a program. <span id="more-7"></span></p>
<p>Blame can and should fall on both sides of the fence here. Customers should insist on it and Contractors need to insist on it. It is good for  both sides. Yes there is an up front cost but its better to build that cost in and know that your  success rate is much higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reqid.com/systems-engineering/systems-engineering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

